<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Did WebmasterWorld Ban Google?</title>
	<link>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2005/11/27/why-did-webmasterworld-ban-google/</link>
	<description>Internet Business and Marketing Trends</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wong Seoul</title>
		<link>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2005/11/27/why-did-webmasterworld-ban-google/#comment-98989</link>
		<dc:creator>Wong Seoul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2005/11/27/why-did-webmasterworld-ban-google/#comment-98989</guid>
		<description>Does not banning a google spider effect their Google PR ? 

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does not banning a google spider effect their Google PR ? </p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travel Resorts Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2005/11/27/why-did-webmasterworld-ban-google/#comment-35948</link>
		<dc:creator>Travel Resorts Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 20:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2005/11/27/why-did-webmasterworld-ban-google/#comment-35948</guid>
		<description>Webmasterworld now has a Page Rank of 8. I wonder what is it that they were thinking. With the amount of content that they provide all they have to do is monetize that traffic and easily pay for the bandwith.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Webmasterworld now has a Page Rank of 8. I wonder what is it that they were thinking. With the amount of content that they provide all they have to do is monetize that traffic and easily pay for the bandwith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
