<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogs Are Just Websites</title>
	<link>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2006/02/26/blogs-are-just-websites/</link>
	<description>Internet Business and Marketing Trends</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Danogo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2006/02/26/blogs-are-just-websites/#comment-93891</link>
		<dc:creator>Danogo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2006/02/26/blogs-are-just-websites/#comment-93891</guid>
		<description>You are so right about blogs just being websites! What a bunch of hyped up nonsense. And blog software is just a Content Management System.  In fact, I use wordpress to create "articles", not blog entries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are so right about blogs just being websites! What a bunch of hyped up nonsense. And blog software is just a Content Management System.  In fact, I use wordpress to create &#8220;articles&#8221;, not blog entries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balazs Balint</title>
		<link>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2006/02/26/blogs-are-just-websites/#comment-51987</link>
		<dc:creator>Balazs Balint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2006/02/26/blogs-are-just-websites/#comment-51987</guid>
		<description>I think you are right: it is hardly possible, to decide whether a site is a blog or not, if consider technical details. On the other hand it is very easy to decide, if you consider that blog is a genre of literature, a public log. That is what makes difference between a commentable news portal and a weblog. 
Of course the borders are not so sharp all the time, but in literture this is natural.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are right: it is hardly possible, to decide whether a site is a blog or not, if consider technical details. On the other hand it is very easy to decide, if you consider that blog is a genre of literature, a public log. That is what makes difference between a commentable news portal and a weblog.<br />
Of course the borders are not so sharp all the time, but in literture this is natural.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
