Comments on: On Net Neutrality http://blogs.webpronews.com/2006/11/09/on-net-neutrality/ Internet Business and Marketing Trends Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:53:40 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2 By: Bernsteinschmuck http://blogs.webpronews.com/2006/11/09/on-net-neutrality/#comment-306085 Bernsteinschmuck Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:48:54 +0000 http://blogs.webpronews.com/2006/11/09/on-net-neutrality/#comment-306085 Hi! I just came across your site. Keep up the good work. bye <a href="http://www.mybernstein.de" rel="nofollow">Bernsteinschmuck</a> Hi!
I just came across your site. Keep up the good work.
bye
Bernsteinschmuck

]]> By: Bernstein http://blogs.webpronews.com/2006/11/09/on-net-neutrality/#comment-1014 Bernstein Tue, 28 Nov 2006 20:24:17 +0000 http://blogs.webpronews.com/2006/11/09/on-net-neutrality/#comment-1014 Hey you, this is a very interest site! I come from germany and sale <a href="http://www.bernsteinfee.de" rel="nofollow">Bernstein</a> I will vistit these Blog soon again to look all the news. Hey you,

this is a very interest site!
I come from germany and sale Bernstein
I will vistit these Blog soon again to look all the news.

]]> By: Propecia http://blogs.webpronews.com/2006/11/09/on-net-neutrality/#comment-787 Propecia Wed, 22 Nov 2006 06:37:06 +0000 http://blogs.webpronews.com/2006/11/09/on-net-neutrality/#comment-787 On the other hand, even with enforced network neutrality, there is thethreat that financially strong organizations can dominate the availablebandwidth directly, as opposed to through contracts with serviceproviders. Also, by asking the government to pass affirmativeregulations governing network neutrality, it opens up a type of Internetregulation never before seen — an ironic position, given that normallythe plea for regulation is brought by those who seek to restrict, rathert On the other hand, even with enforced network neutrality, there is thethreat that financially strong organizations can dominate the availablebandwidth directly, as opposed to through contracts with serviceproviders. Also, by asking the government to pass affirmativeregulations governing network neutrality, it opens up a type of Internetregulation never before seen — an ironic position, given that normallythe plea for regulation is brought by those who seek to restrict, rathert

]]> By: Free Fda Rx http://blogs.webpronews.com/2006/11/09/on-net-neutrality/#comment-785 Free Fda Rx Wed, 22 Nov 2006 06:33:49 +0000 http://blogs.webpronews.com/2006/11/09/on-net-neutrality/#comment-785 The speed of fiber optic communications are at most marginally related to the number of transistorsJ The speed of fiber optic communications are at most marginally related to the number of transistorsJ

]]> By: Liala http://blogs.webpronews.com/2006/11/09/on-net-neutrality/#comment-783 Liala Wed, 22 Nov 2006 06:29:21 +0000 http://blogs.webpronews.com/2006/11/09/on-net-neutrality/#comment-783 It starts out that it’s only to make the spammers and bulk eMailers pay, but you can bet your bottom dollar that everyone eMailing from home, you and me, will pay before it’s over! It starts out that it’s only to make the spammers and bulk eMailers pay, but you can bet your bottom dollar that everyone eMailing from home, you and me, will pay before it’s over!

]]> By: Lorin Thwaits http://blogs.webpronews.com/2006/11/09/on-net-neutrality/#comment-554 Lorin Thwaits Mon, 13 Nov 2006 06:02:37 +0000 http://blogs.webpronews.com/2006/11/09/on-net-neutrality/#comment-554 Looks like we have the Dems back in Congress just in time on this one, that is as long as nothing stupid happens during the "lame duck" session. Here's the letter I wrote to Senator McCain: http://geekswithblogs.net/lorint/archive/2006/11/12/96893.aspx Going to write the other one now. Have you written your senators yet? (By the way "Computer Professional" -- the speed of signaling on fiber lines is controlled by the miniturization and quantity of transistors at the sending and receiving ends, so I would submit that advances in telecommunications are subject to Moore's law.) Looks like we have the Dems back in Congress just in time on this one, that is as long as nothing stupid happens during the “lame duck” session. Here’s the letter I wrote to Senator McCain:

http://geekswithblogs.net/lorint/archive/2006/11/12/96893.aspx

Going to write the other one now. Have you written your senators yet?

(By the way “Computer Professional” — the speed of signaling on fiber lines is controlled by the miniturization and quantity of transistors at the sending and receiving ends, so I would submit that advances in telecommunications are subject to Moore’s law.)

]]> By: Jones Ridge http://blogs.webpronews.com/2006/11/09/on-net-neutrality/#comment-495 Jones Ridge Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:22:52 +0000 http://blogs.webpronews.com/2006/11/09/on-net-neutrality/#comment-495 The bottom line is as usuall, the deciding factor. All these big companies are looking to get fatter, and we lose. It starts out that it's only to make the spammers and bulk eMailers pay, but you can bet your bottom dollar that everyone eMailing from home, you and me, will pay before it's over! The bottom line is as usuall, the deciding factor. All these big companies are looking to get fatter, and we lose. It starts out that it’s only to make the spammers and bulk eMailers pay, but you can bet your bottom dollar that everyone eMailing from home, you and me, will pay before it’s over!

]]> By: Computer Professional http://blogs.webpronews.com/2006/11/09/on-net-neutrality/#comment-481 Computer Professional Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:45:16 +0000 http://blogs.webpronews.com/2006/11/09/on-net-neutrality/#comment-481 Moore’s Law was incorrectly invoked. The speed of fiber optic communications are at most marginally related to the number of transistors in a microprocessor, which is what Moore's Law predicted. Moore’s Law was incorrectly invoked. The speed of fiber optic communications are at most marginally related to the number of transistors in a microprocessor, which is what Moore’s Law predicted.

]]>