Internet Business and Marketing Trends

Make Flash Video Work For You

Back in ancient times (circa 2002), we all dreamed of web TV. No, not that stupid Microsoft set top box… but the capacity for “real” video on the web.

We pined for low bandwidth, glossy video “goodness” delivered, on-demand, right to our PCs. Ladies and gentlemen, I’m not going to claim that golden time is now (that’d certainly be absurd)… but we’re on the right track.

Back before their titanic “fusion” into the super-mega-unstoppable-colossal-golem of creative software known as Adobe, Macromedia sparked this revolution. Which is not to say they’re completely responsible for the rise of web video… but more than anyone else, they’re driving the technology.

Leveraging codecs by Sorenson and On2, Macromedia introduced us to flv with Flash 6. In its own right, simply control over such media within Flash via Actionscript was revolutionary. Additionally, the quality was astonishing given its relatively small size. With its already vast the penetration into the web, one thing was clear: the porn industry was going to love this… oh, and that maybe web video had finally come of age. No more tinny whines and inconsistent audio, no more awkward, blocky compression blemishes.

Ok, that’s enough gushing over Macromedia. It was the practice of utilizing the power we’d been given by this technology which created fads like YouTube. That said, let’s applaud the limits which have been stretched by innovators already utilizing video on the web. Macromedia didn’t exactly make it easy for folks to utilize this format… built in methods include relying on the overpriced Flash Media Sever for streaming or simply offering a progressive download. Canned options impose such limits as creating swfs which hard link directly to flv and “skin” files (which provide the GUI) for each and every video posted. Ouch.

We thirst for a little more flexibility in our interface design, we ache at the thought of revising hundreds of swf files for a site structure revision and we want scripting, damn it! Luckily, none of this was barred… it’s just that the path wasn’t exactly illuminated… or even navigable; most especially for those unfamiliar with Actionscript.

For now, unless you are an Actionscript developer, I see no way to efficiently embed flvs into your site’s infrastructure (barring services like blip.tv, etc.) So, maybe it’s time to take up that torch? For more information, check out my recent article at FlashNewz on how to embed an flv into a Flash application with Actionscript. This is the method employed by the likes of Google, YouTube, Yahoo and the lot. If it’s good enough for them, it’s good enough for me… until a better comes along, of course.

Maybe, some day, Adobe will buck up and make this a bit easier on the rest of us. One can hope. They did, after all, recently deliver on a longstanding promise to release Flash Player 9 Beta for Linux.

Tags: , , , ,

RSS feed | Trackback URI

3 Comments »

Comment by Jake Hawkes
2006-12-08 16:23:45

I would simply like to comment that flash is not the only authoring format for swf’s. I believe that the term “hard linking” is either misleading or not accurate. Hard Linking is not the only way to link to flv video. You can you link to video though mash ups from external sites such as YouTube and others. You can also use easily load all files in a specified server directory, XML, RSS…

 
Comment by Charlie Campbell
2006-12-08 18:13:56

You’re right about the many ways to link to an flv. We use XML here at the WebProNews Video Blog. Perhaps, I wasn’t clear in that by “hard linking” I was referring to the options built into Flash’s “Import Video” functions (using its GUI) which create an swf with an embedded link. If you’re not familiar with non-Flash methods or can’t yet deal with Actionscript, you’re stuck with that link. For more advanced users such as yourself, creating dynamic loading of flvs with Actionscript, ming, etc. should be a snap. :-) Thanks for the clarification, Jake!

 
Comment by Matthias Mauch
2006-12-11 16:00:41

Flash and the W3C Recommendations is a problem. Why? Although some people with disabilities cannot use images, movies and sounds which made with Flash, they need pages that include equivalent information to the visual or auditory content. See the WCAG 1.0, Checkpoint 1.1.

Aside from that, Flash and Adobe is also a problem for all linux users. Ok, a beta is available, but what do linux users with pages that use Flash higher as version 7? It will not work, not fine.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Search WebProBlog

 

WebProBlog Email

 


Recent Posts


» iEntry Links


Categories


Contact WebProBlog

RSS Feeds



Titan Quest Forum
The #1 Titan Quest forum
Halo 3 Forum
The best Halo, Halo 2, Halo 3 forum
Nintendo Wii
Nintendo Wii news and views
Mac Software
The best in OS X freeware
Graphics Forum
Your source for graphic tutorials

About WebProBlog

Welcome to WebProBlog! WebProBlog is essentially the WebProNews staff community blog. Frequently, we may have ideas or observations that may not necessarily be a great fit for a full WebProNews article but would work great in a blog. As a result, you can expect to see posts here from a few WebProNews writers and staff...


WebProBlog WebProNews WebProNews WebProBlog RSS Feed Rich Ord, CEO iEntry inc. Susan Coppersmith David Utter Jason Miller Doug Caverly Mike McDonald Chris Richardson Tiffany Doughty Nathaniel Drake Jay Fougere Rachel Harvey Joe Lewis