<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dave Pasternack: SEO Target</title>
	<link>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/01/24/dave-pasternack-seo-target/</link>
	<description>Internet Business and Marketing Trends</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: SEOs Favourite Bogey Men</title>
		<link>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/01/24/dave-pasternack-seo-target/#comment-60012</link>
		<dc:creator>SEOs Favourite Bogey Men</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 09:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/01/24/dave-pasternack-seo-target/#comment-60012</guid>
		<description>[...] David Pasternack – Dave set the precedent for Calacanis by diplomatically asking whether SEO is Rocket Science As a president of a PPC agency he developed a bit of a reputation for bashing the natural search marketers and Threadwatch decided to give $1000 to who ever could rank for his name. Eventually they felt guilty and gave all their link love to a chef sharing the PPC-praiser’s name. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] David Pasternack – Dave set the precedent for Calacanis by diplomatically asking whether SEO is Rocket Science As a president of a PPC agency he developed a bit of a reputation for bashing the natural search marketers and Threadwatch decided to give $1000 to who ever could rank for his name. Eventually they felt guilty and gave all their link love to a chef sharing the PPC-praiser’s name. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Pasternack contestant</title>
		<link>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/01/24/dave-pasternack-seo-target/#comment-12957</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Pasternack contestant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/01/24/dave-pasternack-seo-target/#comment-12957</guid>
		<description>But it does provide for SEO professionals to test themselves. You wouldn't believe how many quacks are hired for SEO purposes without any experience and proof of what they can do.  &lt;a href='http://www.orleansrestaurant.com/dave_pasternack/dave_pasternack_index.htm' rel="nofollow"&gt;Dave Pasternack&lt;/a&gt; contest at least allows for that. Until the search engines provide for some ways to measure SEO capabilities of SEO professionals, contest will be the only way to measure yourself against others

&lt;a href="http://www.orleansrestaurant.com/dave_pasternack/dave_pasternack_index.htm" title="Dave Pasternack" rel="nofollow"&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But it does provide for SEO professionals to test themselves. You wouldn&#8217;t believe how many quacks are hired for SEO purposes without any experience and proof of what they can do.  <a href='http://www.orleansrestaurant.com/dave_pasternack/dave_pasternack_index.htm' rel="nofollow">Dave Pasternack</a> contest at least allows for that. Until the search engines provide for some ways to measure SEO capabilities of SEO professionals, contest will be the only way to measure yourself against others</p>
<p><a href="http://www.orleansrestaurant.com/dave_pasternack/dave_pasternack_index.htm" title="Dave Pasternack" rel="nofollow"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebProBlog - Internet Business and Marketing Trends&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dave Pasternack Climbs The Rankings</title>
		<link>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/01/24/dave-pasternack-seo-target/#comment-11600</link>
		<dc:creator>WebProBlog - Internet Business and Marketing Trends&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dave Pasternack Climbs The Rankings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/01/24/dave-pasternack-seo-target/#comment-11600</guid>
		<description>[...] When Threadwatch&#8217;s competition first kicked off, Pasternack&#8217;s about me wasn&#8217;t even on the front page of these same Google results. With that in mind, the question becomes, how did Pasternack effect such a change in Google&#8217;s results? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] When Threadwatch&#8217;s competition first kicked off, Pasternack&#8217;s about me wasn&#8217;t even on the front page of these same Google results. With that in mind, the question becomes, how did Pasternack effect such a change in Google&#8217;s results? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Pasternack</title>
		<link>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/01/24/dave-pasternack-seo-target/#comment-10903</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Pasternack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 17:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/01/24/dave-pasternack-seo-target/#comment-10903</guid>
		<description>&#62;Has anyone given thought to the chef who has the same name as the guy that wrote the SEO articles?

This concern is a legitimate one, and it's one reason why my latest articles in DM News have given readers an option to vote for me (Dave Pasternack) or the award-winning chef (David Pasternack). FWIW, the New Yorker will be a very difficult site to displace, and we've seen no movement suggesting this will happen. Of course, we have several weeks to go in this interesting race. My hope is that the end result of this competition will be more, not less relevancy (for goodness sake, we don't need any more irrelevancy than we already have!)

Regards,
Dave Pasternack
Did-it Search Marketing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;Has anyone given thought to the chef who has the same name as the guy that wrote the SEO articles?</p>
<p>This concern is a legitimate one, and it&#8217;s one reason why my latest articles in DM News have given readers an option to vote for me (Dave Pasternack) or the award-winning chef (David Pasternack). FWIW, the New Yorker will be a very difficult site to displace, and we&#8217;ve seen no movement suggesting this will happen. Of course, we have several weeks to go in this interesting race. My hope is that the end result of this competition will be more, not less relevancy (for goodness sake, we don&#8217;t need any more irrelevancy than we already have!)</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Dave Pasternack<br />
Did-it Search Marketing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/01/24/dave-pasternack-seo-target/#comment-10797</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 22:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/01/24/dave-pasternack-seo-target/#comment-10797</guid>
		<description>Has anyone given thought to the chef who has the same name as the guy that wrote the SEO articles?

He is about to drop off the rankings for his own name through no fault of his own, perhaps Aaron could ask for good faith and get the links repointed to the chef's website for week or so to undo the damage.

Just a thought</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone given thought to the chef who has the same name as the guy that wrote the SEO articles?</p>
<p>He is about to drop off the rankings for his own name through no fault of his own, perhaps Aaron could ask for good faith and get the links repointed to the chef&#8217;s website for week or so to undo the damage.</p>
<p>Just a thought</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/01/24/dave-pasternack-seo-target/#comment-8525</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 23:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/01/24/dave-pasternack-seo-target/#comment-8525</guid>
		<description>I didn't realise it was a competition - the gang at webworkshop are putting in an effort to rank for &lt;a href="http://www.webworkshop.net/seoforum/viewtopic.php?t=16392" rel="nofollow"&gt;Dave Pasternack&lt;/a&gt; too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t realise it was a competition - the gang at webworkshop are putting in an effort to rank for <a href="http://www.webworkshop.net/seoforum/viewtopic.php?t=16392" rel="nofollow">Dave Pasternack</a> too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Dave Pasternack - Light of Reason</title>
		<link>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/01/24/dave-pasternack-seo-target/#comment-8247</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Dave Pasternack - Light of Reason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 23:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/01/24/dave-pasternack-seo-target/#comment-8247</guid>
		<description>[...] Web Pro Blog, a part of Web Pro News, is now covering the Dave Pasternack SEO contest, they&#8217;ve got a post that shows up in Google News. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Web Pro Blog, a part of Web Pro News, is now covering the Dave Pasternack SEO contest, they&#8217;ve got a post that shows up in Google News. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
