<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Spaz</title>
	<link>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/06/27/google-spaz/</link>
	<description>Internet Business and Marketing Trends</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 04:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 5feecca42080</title>
		<link>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/06/27/google-spaz/#comment-178004</link>
		<dc:creator>5feecca42080</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 16:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/06/27/google-spaz/#comment-178004</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;5feecca42080&lt;/strong&gt;

5feecca420807f053673</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>5feecca42080</strong></p>
<p>5feecca420807f053673</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oh Yes, the Page Rank rant. &#124; rumblepup</title>
		<link>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/06/27/google-spaz/#comment-94316</link>
		<dc:creator>Oh Yes, the Page Rank rant. &#124; rumblepup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 15:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/06/27/google-spaz/#comment-94316</guid>
		<description>[...] And just few weeks ago, Google bandied out another Googlespaz event that made an whole bunch of people say it more than once. In fact, they probably said it consistently for about 6 hours straight. I had one SEO friend answer the phone that way. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] And just few weeks ago, Google bandied out another Googlespaz event that made an whole bunch of people say it more than once. In fact, they probably said it consistently for about 6 hours straight. I had one SEO friend answer the phone that way. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seo Web Design</title>
		<link>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/06/27/google-spaz/#comment-76054</link>
		<dc:creator>Seo Web Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/06/27/google-spaz/#comment-76054</guid>
		<description>I have observed that Google is updating pages very frequently, which causes up n downs in SERPs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have observed that Google is updating pages very frequently, which causes up n downs in SERPs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrickHudson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/06/27/google-spaz/#comment-68397</link>
		<dc:creator>patrickHudson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 07:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/06/27/google-spaz/#comment-68397</guid>
		<description>Hi, i had read your post regarding google spaz. It is correct that the google will be changing our sites or vanishing in a day and coming on the next day. But you need to think practically  that the google will &lt;a href="http://www.erpwire.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;update&lt;/a&gt;
the pages every day. So, it may take some time for our site to come in the SERP page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, i had read your post regarding google spaz. It is correct that the google will be changing our sites or vanishing in a day and coming on the next day. But you need to think practically  that the google will <a href="http://www.erpwire.com" rel="nofollow">update</a><br />
the pages every day. So, it may take some time for our site to come in the SERP page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Algorithm Update Analysis - WebProWorld</title>
		<link>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/06/27/google-spaz/#comment-63138</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Algorithm Update Analysis - WebProWorld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 04:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/06/27/google-spaz/#comment-63138</guid>
		<description>[...] Re: Google Algorithm Update Analysis     This is a surprising article, really, because it's coming from none other than Dave Davies. I can only critique here, because as everyone knows, I'm not a SEO expert, just an entrepreneur, who's business relies on web searches.   The one problem I have is that Dave didn't have representative numbers and examples to quantify what he was postulating. I, as did Mike McDonald, and a few guys out there, did notice some algo goofiness a few weeks ago, but everything seems to be back to normal, and well SEO'd sites still feel the same benefit of good SEO practices.   While I'm not an &#34;SEO expert&#34; professional, like yourself, or the other SEO rockstars out there, I don't really agree with all of this article, because it makes some assertions that I think is very strange for Dave Davies to make. Worst part is, I'll probably bump into him at SES, and be all bashful like.   What surprises me is that Dave Davies is referring to only 5 days of Google weirdness, when as a professional, I think he should have waited a bit, and made appropriate assertions after really observing that a definitive change was taking place.   So I'm gonna remark here on a section by section basis, and try not to sound too much like a big dummy head rumblepup.   Quote: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Re: Google Algorithm Update Analysis     This is a surprising article, really, because it&#8217;s coming from none other than Dave Davies. I can only critique here, because as everyone knows, I&#8217;m not a SEO expert, just an entrepreneur, who&#8217;s business relies on web searches.   The one problem I have is that Dave didn&#8217;t have representative numbers and examples to quantify what he was postulating. I, as did Mike McDonald, and a few guys out there, did notice some algo goofiness a few weeks ago, but everything seems to be back to normal, and well SEO&#8217;d sites still feel the same benefit of good SEO practices.   While I&#8217;m not an &quot;SEO expert&quot; professional, like yourself, or the other SEO rockstars out there, I don&#8217;t really agree with all of this article, because it makes some assertions that I think is very strange for Dave Davies to make. Worst part is, I&#8217;ll probably bump into him at SES, and be all bashful like.   What surprises me is that Dave Davies is referring to only 5 days of Google weirdness, when as a professional, I think he should have waited a bit, and made appropriate assertions after really observing that a definitive change was taking place.   So I&#8217;m gonna remark here on a section by section basis, and try not to sound too much like a big dummy head rumblepup.   Quote: [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PHP Hosting</title>
		<link>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/06/27/google-spaz/#comment-56695</link>
		<dc:creator>PHP Hosting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 15:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/06/27/google-spaz/#comment-56695</guid>
		<description>Yep, rankings are not stable. That's the fact, as Google craws more and more sites, they get included in SERPs as per their rankings. This might give you different results on hourly, daily basis. These are not major changes though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, rankings are not stable. That&#8217;s the fact, as Google craws more and more sites, they get included in SERPs as per their rankings. This might give you different results on hourly, daily basis. These are not major changes though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Chow (Still) Banned by Google? - Jaan&#8217;s Search Marketing Blog - Toledo, Ohio</title>
		<link>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/06/27/google-spaz/#comment-54439</link>
		<dc:creator>John Chow (Still) Banned by Google? - Jaan&#8217;s Search Marketing Blog - Toledo, Ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 03:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/06/27/google-spaz/#comment-54439</guid>
		<description>[...] Now their is another possibility. Google rankings are simply going nuts. Mike McDonald (an Admin at WPW) has noticed more than average change in rankings on not only a daily basis, but from hour to hour. Since Mike has pointed this out I have been watching and have noticed the same thing for some queries I follow. I doubt this is the root of the John Chow issue, but I know something is weird about this to. Sure I know rankings are not stable for many different reasons like: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Now their is another possibility. Google rankings are simply going nuts. Mike McDonald (an Admin at WPW) has noticed more than average change in rankings on not only a daily basis, but from hour to hour. Since Mike has pointed this out I have been watching and have noticed the same thing for some queries I follow. I doubt this is the root of the John Chow issue, but I know something is weird about this to. Sure I know rankings are not stable for many different reasons like: [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joomla Hosting</title>
		<link>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/06/27/google-spaz/#comment-53071</link>
		<dc:creator>Joomla Hosting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 09:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/06/27/google-spaz/#comment-53071</guid>
		<description>That's true. But it will be because of other sites [competitors] are boosting their results by getting more and more backlinks and optimizing their sites effectively as you do for yours ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s true. But it will be because of other sites [competitors] are boosting their results by getting more and more backlinks and optimizing their sites effectively as you do for yours <img src='http://blogs.webpronews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike McDonald</title>
		<link>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/06/27/google-spaz/#comment-52950</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike McDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 19:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/06/27/google-spaz/#comment-52950</guid>
		<description>Incidentally, it's back in the index as of last night.  It even got a second (indented) listing - which is always nice...   But I bet it falls out again before the weekend is over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, it&#8217;s back in the index as of last night.  It even got a second (indented) listing - which is always nice&#8230;   But I bet it falls out again before the weekend is over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xoops Hosting</title>
		<link>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/06/27/google-spaz/#comment-52887</link>
		<dc:creator>Xoops Hosting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.webpronews.com/2007/06/27/google-spaz/#comment-52887</guid>
		<description>Same situation over here, ups and downs, now and then. 
I am trying to be patient. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same situation over here, ups and downs, now and then.<br />
I am trying to be patient. <img src='http://blogs.webpronews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
